How Happy could Gay Men be in a Homophobic Society such as Ours Essay

homoeroticism is no longer an undis closed(a) fancy amongst us, and their creation in our orderliness is no longer a marvel to be raised. As we k right forward, they enter the like shops we visit every now and then they ride the same buses and subways we catch they walk the same streets we tramp down everyday they breathe the same air we do, all(prenominal) for bingle bare reason they are no less human than any of us in this society could possibly be.Despite the common knowledge we all book ab bring out the existence of these people who suddenly came out from the box, it legato raises assorted re feations from the crowd of the so called normal peopleas the society itself may confabulate to it. While others have learned to accept the presumptuousness fact that on that point is a possibility of alteration to the socially flummox standard of normality, such as this one on the area of gender, there are still some who good couldnt practice the act of coexistence with th ese so called new breeds. There are still people who sacredly believe that the defiance of the norm such as crossing from one gender to a nonher is absolutely unacceptable. Given this reality, a lot of attempts have been made to somehow sway these people out of their enclosed bubbles. until now media, one of the roughly influential elements in our society, took a step get ahead by recognizing the existence of frolicsomes and lesbians in their projects themed after different slices of smell the like the top notching series Will & Grace, and the award-winning movie Philadelphia.With peoples warm embrace with the idea in moving pictures, it seemed no off the beaten track(predicate) from the possibility that they could, one way or other, welcome the idea in reality with open arms the scarcely question remaining is how broad(a) open could these people extend their arms based on what their goggle boxs cave in them? According to Marisa Conolly on her article entitled Homosexual ity on video recording The Heterosexualization of Will & Grace in Print Media, despite the television scan Will & Graces attempt to promote the normality of the existence of gay men in the society, the show wasnt able to in full liberate the misunderstood bunch.Intentionally or not, current limitations have been isthmus by the verbalise show, leaving unnecessary provisions among viewing au fleetnce which they could refer to in terms of classifying homoeroticism unacceptable and acceptable for the publics eyes. Generally, Will, one of the main characters of the said show who happens to play a jump of a supposed homosexual, was somehow portrayed in a straight person manner his mere association with Grace, a straight female character, shades the scene to a different color.Their supposed friendship was brought into a different heterosexual border of relationship, wherein platonic is brought into a twisted romantic weightsomehow portraying him caught in between the certainty of quirk and the temperament to lean on heterosexuality. Unfortunately, their possible interest to sell is totally negating the progress of the other, thus making it much complicated for the viewing audience whether to absorb him as a subtle gay who apparently essays recognition, or as a male, in the middle of an identity crisis, still clinging on the idealism of heterosexuality through tricky dramatization of his relationship with a straight woman.The same idea was raised in the film Philadelphia by Jonathan Demme. On the said movie, instead weighing through the inconsistency of the perceived portrayation of character, the viewers are simply being caught in the middle of a life and end situation. Instead of making their viewers understand the real match within the extent of reality that the film itself is providing, they are subconsciously redefining ignominy as a substitute for this understanding. They have misused the forthcoming of death to the gay personas advantage b y playing on it as if saying Hey, I am dying now of AIDS, and I am gay.Now that I provide be leaving this deathlike place soon, will you please have the compassion of accepting me for who I really am? Personally, I dont think that this is the good way of educating the people because it is basically misleading. Though the two groups are about knitted by its constant reception of seclusion from the society, it is unfair to learn being gay no different from having AIDS. Being gay is not a deadly viral disease like AIDS it is simply a way of life that is, more(prenominal) often than not, being misunderstood.Upon reflexion the film, I was left caught at the vagueness of Denzel Washingtons character. I design at first that he will be the one trusty to set free Tom Hanks character, but by the end of the film, my hopes were dropped on the floor. His supposed homophobia, which I first thought will be the resilient element he has as one of the lead character, somehow got unconnect ed in the latter part of the story. The leave tackled dealt mainly on Hanks viral illness and how most people generally react to itgiving the homosexuality issue, which is more widespread in reality, a weak standpoint.The common con sloperation between the two different portrayals of gay men stated to a higher place is its tendency to seek for conditions beforehand actually opening the idea of acceptance. For television sitcom Will & Grace, they sought for a subtle way to aline with the norms by partially heterosexualizing the gay character, while for the movie Philadelphia, they played with emotions, most specifically guilt, by bringing into their attention that death is an uneventful afterlife for the character.Basically, in their own particular ways, they are always looking for certain loop holes to pull off homoeroticism acceptablemeaning gayness itself defines no reason to stand on its own. In this case, their uncritical viewers tend to get accustomed in looking for such passages before they actually accept certain circumstances, which unfortunately not every gay man has. In the end, publication of ideas and slices of life such as these whole implies that as time passed by the society is still keeping its doors closed to the recognition of homosexualitys existence.Again it only shows the greatest failing that any society has a fear of the unordinary. They are not barely liberation but rather a form of deception in order to switch the attention of the critical public regarding their claim for wide recognition to homosexuals. None of these moving images placed a dot at the end of the statement we accept homosexuality instead, they only made the issue more complex than ever by adding up the condition if and only if to the said declaration. If the shows themselves couldnt accept the fact that gay men exist, how could their viewers do?I could give credit for the attempt pull out gays and lesbians from their malicious-satirical stereotype of simply b eing unpleasant, loud and mischievous, but still, that doesnt rent it enough for me. Compassion may be the best way to seek approval, but seeking proofs out of the ordinary and passing it off as the best solution is nothing but a substandard achievement. Homosexuality isnt actually an issue seeking for a special handling that will be way too much for a cultivation now that it couldnt even reach the approval of being line up on the average level.All gays and lesbians need is the chance to be treated in a normal wayno more and no less than how people accept heterosexualswhere in they are not shoved away as if they are infectious beasts. Since media started this crooked representation of homosexuality on screen in the first place, I believe that they will be the only one who could correct this. Next time they acquire best selling stories about homosexuals on their reels, they should try taking away those special cases that tend to sensationalize their storieslike exploring Wills ma nly side as a gay man and Hanks incurable illness.If they want to represent gay men as part of the normal sector in our society, then they could probably represent them as simple as being other friendly neighbor from the block without a semi-romantic relationship with a straight female, but rather a nonchalant relationship with another man, or a winnerful lawyer who need not die at the end of the story just to gain recognition for his success as a lawyer instead, he could just be another lawyer who saved the dayroles as simple as that, just like most heterosexuals portray.In that way, it will seem to be more realistic and fair for these people who usually live under the empennage of our judgmental society.